|01-31-2014 11:54 AM||| Edited by Override 01-31-2014 12:04 PM|
What is Cross Site Scripting?
Cross-site scripting (XSS)is a type of computer security vulnerability typically found in web applications which allow code injection by malicious web users into the web pages viewed by other users. Cross-site scripting holes in general can be seen as vulnerabilities which allow attackers to bypass security mechanisms. By finding clever ways of injecting malicious scripts into web pages an attacker can gain elevated access privileges to sensitive page content, session cookies, and a variety of other objects.
There are three distinct types of XSS vulnerabilities:
and DOM-based (which can be either persistent or non-persistent).
Non-persistent cross-site scripting hole is also referred to as a reflected vulnerability, and is by far the most common type. These holes show up when data provided by a web client is used immediately by server-side scripts to generate a page of results for that user. A classic example of this is in site search engines: if one searches for a string which includes some HTML special characters, often the search string will be redisplayed on the result page to indicate what was searched for, or will at least include the search terms in the text box for easier editing. If any occurrence of the search terms is not HTML entity encoded, an XSS hole will result.
Persistent XSS vulnerability is also referred to as a stored or second-order vulnerability, and it allows the most powerful kinds of attacks. A type 2 XSS vulnerability exists when data provided to a web application by a user is first stored persistently on the server (in a database, file system, or other location), and later displayed to users in a web page without being encoded using HTML entities. A classic example of this is with online message boards, where users are allowed to post.
Finding XSS Vulnerabilities
The most common used XSS injection test is:
When this example is injected into an input box or a URL parameter, it will either fire or it will fail. If the injection fails, it doesn't mean the site is secure, it just means you need to look deeper.
XSS Filter Evasion
Escaping From Strings/
The first step is to view source on the Web page and see if you can find the
injected string in the HTML.There are several places you may find it completely intact, yet
hidden from the casual observer.The first is within an input parameter:
In this example we could alter our input to include two characters that allow the
injected code to jump out of the single quotes:
Now our code renders because we have ended the input encapsulation and HTML tag before our vector, which allows it to fire.
However, in this case, the extraneous single quote and closed angle bracket are displayed
on the Web page.This can be suppressed if we update our vector into the following:
This turns the code output into:
<xss a=''> tag does not render, because it is not valid.
Working Around Filtered Quotes
Let's use the same example above, but assume the Webmaster included code to put
slashes in front of any single quotes or double quotes (i.e., add_slashes()). Our previous vector
without the last part would now turn into:
There are several methods to try and work around this it all depends on the filtering in place.
One method is to use Character Entities.
Some characters are reserved in HTML. For example, you cannot use the greater than or less than signs within your text because the browser could mistake them for markup.
If we want the browser to actually display these characters we must insert character entities in the HTML source.
Using the code (") or (") in place of our quotes is one method to try and work around quote filtering.
The fromCharCode() takes the specified Unicode values and returns a string.
<INPUT type="text" value='\'><SCRIPT>alert(String.fromCharCode(88,83,83))</SCRIPT>'>
You can use the For MySql char(ASCII,ASCII,...): calculator bellow to translate your code into CharCode.
Working Around <SCRIPT> Filtering
The "onload" keyword inside HTML represents an event handler. It doesn't work with
all HTML tags, but it is particularly effective inside BODY tags.That said, there are instances
where this approach will fail, such as when the BODY onload event handler is previously
overloaded higher on the page before your vector shows up. Another useful example is the
inside it to render, all without ever calling a <script> tag.
Using IMG SRC
The two most commonly permitted HTML tags are <A HREF, which is used for
embedded links, and <IMG, which is used to embedded images. Of these two, the
most dangerous is the IMG tag.
The follow illustrates some examples of why this tag is problematic:
No quotes and no semicolon:
Filtering quotes and script:
Using CharCode to work around filtering quotes:
A simple attack vector, like the one above, can be even further obfuscated by transforming
the entire string into the decimal equivalent of the ASCII characters:
Using the ASCII table you can decipher this example, and then use the same method of obfuscation to create your own injectable string.
The same can be done for hexadecimal:
works in IE 6.0, Opera 9.0, Netscape 8.0 (when in the IE rendering engine, although it has also been
depreciated as of 8.1)
Using Tab, New Line, and Carriage Return
Tab, new line and carriage return characters can also be used to trick XSS filters.
Using Null character
Another character that can cause problems for filters is the null character. This is one of
the most obscure and powerful tools in any XSS arsenal.
Take this example URL that can lead to a valid injection:
The null character (%00) stops the filters from recognizing the <SCRIPT> tag. This
only works in IE 6.0, IE 7.0, and Netscape 8.0 in IE rendering engine mode.
Not filtering inside encapsulating pairs
Bypassing filtering that looks for open and closing pairs of encapsulation
inside HTML tags and ignore the contents.
Technically, inside the IMG tag, the first two quotes should be considered encapsulation
and should do nothing.The next quote should allow encapsulation and go to the next quote
which is after the </SCRIPT> tag. Lastly, it should be closed by the trailing end angle
bracket. But all major browsers, such as, IE, Firefox, Netscape, or Opera take this as malformed HTML and attempt to fix it.
The output then looks like:
CSS Filter Evasion
However, IE has depreciated this as of 7.0, and it no longer works, you can still get
it working in Opera and users who may still have IE 6.0 installed.
Another way is to use the <STYLE> tag. It is rare that users have access to modify styles but it does happen. This is more common in cases of forums where users have access to the layout and design on their post. The following will work in IE and Netscape in the IE rendering engine mode:
Using the above as an example, you can see how the expression tag allows the attacker
Still, it is not safe, as we can inject something called a data directive in this case,
we have base64 encoded the simple string <script>alert('XSS')</script>.
The data directive allows us to inject entire documents inside a single string.
The data directive works inside Firefox, Netscape in Gecko rendering engine mode, and Opera.
Using Double Quotes
Escaping quotes is sometimes usefull when there is an own written protection against XSS. This will allow you to escape the escape characters used by the XSS filter script.
It's worth mentioning that this will ONLY work if it's an own written (weak) defending script.
The result would be:
As you can see your own escape characters now filter out the escape characters used by the XSS protection.
It is often assumed that if all angle brackets and quotes have been filtered that XSS is no longer possible. However XSS is reliant upon the browser, so as long as the browser can understand other encoding methods, you can run into situations where a browser will run commands without any of those characters.</p>
<p>A real world example of an XSS encoded vulnerability was found in Google search appliance by a hacker named Maluc. Maluc found that a normal Google search appliance query looked like:
He noticed that according to this string (oe=UTF-8) he could change the UTF code.
He changed the UTF string from UTF-8 to UTF-7.
UTF-7 (7-bit Unicode Transformation Format)</b> is a variable-length character encoding that was proposed for representing Unicode-encoded text using a stream of ASCII characters, for example for use in Internet e-mail messages. UTF-7 is generally not used as a native representation within applications as it is very awkward to process despite its size advantage over the combination of UTF-8 with either quoted-printable or base64.
Lets take for example:
And encode it using UTF-7:
Now all + have to be changed to URL code in a GET strings for this to work. So the URL code for + is %2B now we have:
URL encoding is turning a string into a safe block of text for appending on the query string of a URL.To encode characters to append to a URL, you use a percentage symbol, followed by the two-digit hex number representing that character.
With this Maluc came up with:
And was able to successfully execute an XSS script.
Of course the effect of the XSS is only temporary and only affects the user who
go to that URL, but this could easily provide an avenue for phishing. In this way, Google
appliance has hurt Stanford University's security by being placed on the same domain.
Written by Override and Killordie
Rsnake, XSS (Cross Site Scripting) Cheat
http://ha.ckers.org/xss.html [viewed 07/25/2009].
XSS (Cross Site Scripting) Prevention Cheat Sheet
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/XSS_(Cross_Site_Scripting)_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet [viewed 07/25/2009].</p>
Xylitol (2008) Cross Site Scripting - Attack and Defense guide
http://milw0rm.com/papers/192 [viewed 07/25/2009].
Langy,XSS Guide - 1st Part
http://www.googlebig.com/forum/-en-xss-guide-1st-part-t-157.html [viewed 07/25/2009].
|02-16-2014 05:17 AM|
|Awesome Tutorial! Thz bro!|
|Jump to Forum:
Forum powered by fusionBoard